Health Salon

Your Source for Cutting Edge Information in Alternative Health Care thats hard to find.




  • Subscribe

    • AddThis Feed Button

Links

Ozone in the Treatment of Diabetic Leg Ulcers – Article by Dr Sunnen

21st March 2007 by Arrow Durfee Posted in Uncategorized

Those in the medical profession have known for some time that pressurised oxyen delivered via hyperbaric chambers have profound effects on healing diabetic leg ulcers. The chambers are used more for this single condition than all others. Now with the advent of the use of Ozone in the USA the expensive hyperbaric chambers and time consuming protocols of hyperbaric therapy can be avoided. Doctors can perform Ozone therapy in their clinic or it could be administered in the patient room in the hospital by wound care specialists. With some staff training advanced wound care protocols can be brought to the public in any facility, being a hospital, nursing home or clinic. It might even be possible for home care nurses to administer treatment in a patients home with portable Ozonaators……….Thank You Dr Sunnan for bringing this article to my attention…Arrow
………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

Diabetic Leg Ulcers: A Missing Ingredient
in Their Treatment and Management

www.triroc.com/sunnen/topics/diabetes.leg.htm

by Gérard V. Sunnen, M.D.
© March 2007

Introduction

Diabetes is a disorder of metabolism and of the circulation. Chronic metabolic irregularities linked to poor circulatory perfusion and nerve damage can affect a number of organ systems, including skin tissues. In this article, the focus is on factors in diabetes that can contribute to dermal breakdown, ulceration, and infection. Most importantly, it proposes a treatment modality, which, backed by solid experimental, and clinical data cumulated worldwide, shows great promise in the management of diabetes-related skin lesions.

The conditions surveyed include infected wounds, skin ulcers and gangrene. These wounds, in the context of diabetes, are notoriously difficult to resolve. Healing resistance is thus a well-recognized element of frustration in their clinical care.

In most of the above conditions, multiple factors play into healing resistance. Among them are circulatory impairments, neurological deficits, tissue injury, and immunological compromise. A central factor is the proliferation of infectious microorganisms that, by the variety of their families, their toxin-producing capacities, and their resistance to antibiotics, offer daunting obstacles to standard treatment regimens.

Approximately 15% of the estimated 20 million Americans afflicted with diabetes mellitus develop lower leg skin ulcers. Of those patients, 20% will eventually require amputations. Diabetes mellitus is the leading cause of nontraumatic lower extremity amputation in the United States (LeRoith 2003).

Factors contributing to skin lesions in diabetes:

Circulatory impairment

Arteries and arterioles in chronic diabetes are prone to plaque buildup (Tesfaye 2005). The precise reason for this phenomenon is still elusive, yet it is well documented that Type II non-insulin dependent diabetes is linked to abnormal blood lipid profiles known as diabetic dyslipidemia (Goldberg 2004). Low-density lipoproteins particles are smaller in size and thus more apt to adhere to vessel walls, resulting in progressive vascular occlusion (Beckman 2002; Renard 2004). Lowered oxygen and nutrient supplies stress tissue resilience and impair recovery from injury (Chapnick 1996).

Neuropathy

Poorly controlled diabetes is correlated with peripheral nerve dysfunction. The mechanisms of diabetic injury to neurons are poorly understood. Higher blood glucose level seem to promote oxidative stress in neurons, but much more complex mechanisms are implicated (Tomlinson 2002).

Diabetic neuropathy can involve motor, sensory, and autonomic system neurons. Sensory neuron malfunction is translated as loss of feeling, reflex loss, problems with limb position sense, tingling (paresthesias) and pain. Motor impairment shows as muscle weakness. Autonomic neuropathy alters local circulation (Boulton 2004, Bensal 2006).

Mechanical stress

Chronic and repeating pressure on the skin compresses dermal arterioles, inhibiting tissue perfusion. Tissue weakness leads to ulceration. Ulcers are fertile ground for pathogenic microorganisms, and surrounding tissues become prone to cellulitis. At times, the ulcer crater reaches the underlying bone, initiating osteomyelitis (Boulton 2000).

Ozone

The oxygen atom exists in nature in several forms: (1) As a free atomic particle, singlet oxygen (0), it is highly reactive and unstable. (2) Oxygen (02), its most common and stable form, is colorless as a gas and pale blue as a liquid. (3) Ozone (03), has a molecular weight of 48, a density one and a half times that of oxygen, and contains a large excess of energy (03 g 3/2 02 + 143 KJ/mole). It has a bond angle of 127° ± 3°, resonates among several hybrid forms, is distinctly blue as a gas, and dark blue as a solid. (4) 04, a very unstable, rare, nonmagnetic pale blue gas readily breaks down into two molecules of oxygen.

Ozone, as a triatomic configuration of oxygen, possesses supreme oxidizing power derived from its marked tropism for extracting electrons from other molecules, simultaneously releasing one of its own oxygen atoms in the process.

Ozone as a drug

Ozone’s capacity for inactivating microorganisms has been increasingly appreciated since the turn of the last century (Viebahn 1999). In the past few decades, ozone’s action against bacteria, viruses and fungi has sparked keen interest for its use, not only for purifying water supplies, but also for medical objectives.

Ozone/oxygen mixtures exert significant antimicrobial activity. As with many medications, however, ozone has a range of action that, in the terminology of pharmacokinetics, is referred to as a therapeutic window (Bocci 2005). Indeed, ozone applied in concentrations that are too low, has little therapeutic effect. Applied externally in high concentrations, ozone may become irritating and tissue-toxic.

Due to ozone’s demarcated therapeutic range, ozone concentrations administered to the patient need to be carefully calibrated and controlled. Optimally therapeutic ozone/oxygen mixtures require state of the art quantitative (dosage, concentration), as well as qualitative (purity) controls currently available in contemporary ozone generation technologies, all predicated upon the evaluation of the lesions under treatment.

Ozone generation and administration

Ozone is a gas with a half-life of approximately one hour at room temperature. Medical ozone generation and delivery systems therefore require that ozone be created at the moment it is to be administered. Ozone, in this sense is not a drug that has a shelf life enabling it to be kept for long periods of time.

Ozone is created by applying energy to oxygen. The oxygen source should be pure and devoid of nitrogen or other impurities. The presence of too much nitrogen favors the production of tissue-toxic nitrogen oxides.

Importantly, the humidity level of the ozone/oxygen mixture enters into the treatment protocol. Indeed, in certain wounds, humidity added to the ozone/oxygen mixture, markedly enhances therapeutic results.

Ozone’s actions on wound pathogens

Bacteria fare poorly when exposed to ozone, a fact appreciated since the 19th century (Viebahn 1999). Ozone is a strong germicide needing only micrograms per liter for measurable action. At a concentration of 1 mg per liter of water at 1°C, ozone rapidly inactivates coliform bacteria, staphylococcus aureus, and Aeromonas hydrophilia (Lohr 1984). The inactivation rate for E. coli, takes place in relatively small concentrations of ozone, and is influenced by pH and temperature (Ivanova 1983).

At dosage concentrations used in external therapy, ozone essentially inactivates all bacterial species. This holds true for oxygen-dependent aerobic organisms, for oxygen-independent anaerobic bacteria associated with gangrene, and for facultative species that can function with or without oxygen. Spores and cysts are neutralized as well (Ishizaki 1986, Langlais 1986). Spores of Bacillus cereus and Bacillus megaterium are susceptible to ozone exposure (Broadwater 1973). Ozone’s universal antibacterial action makes it an agent of choice in the management of wound infections colonized by bacterial species belonging to diverse groups.

An incomplete list of bacterial families susceptible to ozone inactivation includes the Enterobacteriaceae, a large group whose natural habitat is the intestinal tract of mammals. These Gram-negative organisms include Escherichia coli, Salmonella, Enterobacter, Shigella, Klebsiella, Serratia, and Proteus. Other ozone-sensitive bacterial species include Streptococci, Staphylococci, Legionella, Pseudomonas, Yersinia, Campylobacteri, and Mycobacteria (Dyas 1983, Broadwater 1973).

The cell envelopes of bacteria are composed of intricate multilayers. Covering the bacterial cytoplasm to form the innermost layer of the envelope is the cytoplasmic membrane, made of phospholipids and proteins. Next, a polymeric layer built with giant peptidoglycan molecules provides bacteria with a stable architecture. In Gram-positive organisms, the pepticoglycan shell is thick and rigid. By contrast, Gram-negative bacteria possess a thin pepticoglycan lamella on which is superimposed an outer membrane made of lipoproteins and lipopolysaccharides. In acid-fast bacteria, such as Mycobacterium, up to one half of the capsule is formed of complex lipids (Parish 2005, Hogg 2005).

The most cited explanation for ozone’s bactericidal effects centers on disruption of cell membrane integrity through oxidation of its phospholipids and lipoproteins. There is evidence for interaction with proteins as well (Mudd 1969). In one study exploring the effect of ozone on E. coli, evidence was found for ozone’s penetration through the cell membrane, breaking the closed circular plasmid DNA, which would presumably diminish the efficiency of bacterial procreation (Ishizaki 1987).

Fungi

Fungi are frequent inhabitants of chronically infected wounds. One study (Moussa 1999) found colonization by Candida and Aspergillus. Fungal organisms neutralized by ozone exposure include Candida, Aspergillus, Histoplasma, Actinomycoses, and Cryptococcus. The multilayered cell walls of fungi, composed of carbohydrates, proteins and glycoproteins, contain many disulfide bonds sensitive to ozone oxidation.

Protozoa

Protozoan organisms are often found in chronically infected wounds. Species disrupted by ozone include Giardia, Cryptosporidium, and free-living amoebas, including Acanthamoeba, Hartmonella, and Negleria. Several authors have demonstrated ozone’s capacity to penetrate through the walls of Giardia cysts causing fatal structural damage (Widmer 2002, Wickramanayake 1984).

Ozone’s cutaneous physiological effects

Oxygen has long been established as beneficial in many pathological conditions, forming the basis for the use of hyperbaric oxygen treatment for carbon monoxide poisoning, decompression sickness, gas gangrene and stroke, among others. Oxygen under pressure, applied to infected tissues, inhibits the proliferation of anaerobic bacteria and stimulates local circulation (Wunderlich 2000).

Ozone, when added to oxygen, however, has properties that clearly transcend oxygen administration alone. The two properties invoked are:

Ozone’s extremely broad range of antipathogenic action and,
The vasodilation of arterioles promoting tissue oxygenation and the delivery of nutrients and immunological factors to compromised tissues; and the vasodilation of veins, increasing venous outflow and the removal of toxins.
Diabetic skin conditions benefited by ozone therapy:

Wounds with a potential for infection

This category addresses wounds that are not yet infected but have a high probability for eventual infection. Post-surgical wounds, injuries such as abrasions, contusions and lacerations are salient examples.

The use of topical ozone therapy in these cases may be solely preventive, aimed at inhibiting the proliferation of potentially infective organisms. Preventative topical ozone therapy may thus stave off the development of potentially disastrous infectious complications.

Poorly healing wounds

Wounds healing in an indolent manner are apt to regress if treatment continuity is interrupted.

In these wounds, anaerobic bacteria – bacteria that do not need oxygen for their growth (e.g., Bacteroides, Clostridium) – may be active at deeper levels of the dermis, insulated from the influence of oxygen. While anaerobic bacteria are responsible for many devastating infections including gas gangrene, aerobic bacteria normally found on skin surfaces such as Staphylococcus epidermis, Corynebacteria, and Propionobacteria, given propitious circumstances, are capable of remarkable aggressive infectivity.

Diabetic leg ulcers

Diabetic ulceration is accelerated by poor circulation and neuropathy. One study (Anandi 2004) reported bacterial culture results for 107 patients with diabetic foot lesions. They included E. coli, Klebsiella, Pseudomonas, Proteus, Enterobacter, Clostridium perfringens, Bacteroides, Prevotella, and Peptostreptococcus.

The treatment of diabetic ulcers requires a multidisciplinary approach, including surgical, topical, and systemic interventions when indicated (Cavanagh 2005, Kruse 2006). Topical antibiotics often fail to penetrate far enough into the wound and frequently cause secondary dermatitis and allergy in their own right (De Groot 1994). For this reason, they are not generally recommended. Systemic antibiotics, prescribed for infections transgressing ulcer borders, can only address a portion of the spectrum of microorganisms cultured from such wounds. Bacterial resistance is common (e.g., ß-lactam antibiotic resistance, as in methicillin-resistant staphylococcus).

Ozone applications in diabetic ulcers provide essential dual functions of topical broad-spectrum coverage and circulatory stimulation. In addition, ozone, via multiple serial applications and higher dose ranges, is able to further its penetration into deeper tissue layers where anaerobic bacteria are apt to reside.

Gangrene

Gas gangrene, also known as necrotizing fascitis, myositis, and myonecrosis is feared because of its rapid evolution leading to the galloping breakdown of affected tissues (Chapnick 1996, Falanga 2002)).

Several bacterial species are implicated in this process, the most common being Clostridium and toxin-producing Group A Streptococcus families. Other bacterial species implicated in gas gangrene include E. coli, Proteus, Staphylococcus, Vibrio, Bacteriodes, and Fusiforms (Caballero 1998). Gas gangrene may become a fatal complication of diabetic and decubitus ulcers.

Anaerobic and facultative bacteria feed on sugars and glycogen, produce lactic acid, and gases such as methane, carbon dioxide, and hydrogen. Their life threatening toxins cause severe tissue breakdown, hemolysis, renal failure, and shock.

These impressively destructive wounds demand emergency ozone application as an important adjunct to their multidisciplinary interventions.

The practice of external ozone therapy in diabetic skin lesions

In every case, an individual assessment has to be made relative to the skin lesion under treatment. Noted in this evaluation are the size (diameter and depth) of the lesion, and in deeper lesions, the involvement of dermal tissues, ligaments, muscle and bone. Also, the presence of purulence and necrosis, the relative health of surrounding tissues, and adjacent circulatory competence.

Ozone therapy is always individualized to incorporate these clinical observations. Accordingly, ozone concentrations are adjusted, as are lengths and frequencies of treatment, all recalibrated as treatment progresses.

In the practice of external ozone application, a specially designed ozone-resistant envelope is used to enclose the area being treated. A precise fitting of the envelope is needed in order to ensure a constant ozone/oxygen concentration within the envelope milieu and a proper containment of the gas. Ozone will thus be prevented from escaping into the ambient environment, reducing respiratory exposure to treating personnel.

The ozone concentrations prescribed during the course of treatment, the duration and frequency of individual sessions, and the lengths of the overall course of therapy are all predicated upon the evolution of the specific medical condition under treatment. In extensive wet ulcers and burns, for example, initial topical ozone concentrations need to be low in order to prevent excessive systemic ozone absorption. With gradual epitheliazation of the ulcer wound, applied ozone concentrations will require corresponding adjustments.

Advantages of topical ozone therapy in diabetes

The ease of administration of this therapy. Once the principles of ozone dynamics and the art of adapting ozone dosages and treatment protocols are mastered by the clinician, topical oxygen/ozone therapy can safely be applied to a broad range of diabetes-related afflictions.

Ozone is an effective antagonist to an enormous range of pathogenic organisms. In this regard, ozone cannot be equaled. It inactivates aerobic, facultative, and anaerobic bacterial organisms, a wide spectrum of viruses, and a comprehensive range of fungal and protozoan pathogens. To replicate this therapeutic action, ulcerative conditions would have to be treated with an assortment of various systemic antibiotic agents. In the context of accepted contemporary medical practice, this is not feasible.

External ozone therapy, applied in a timely fashion, may obviate the need for systemic antipathogen therapy, thus saving the patient from all the side effects and organ stresses this option entails. External ozone is both a preventive, acute care, and chronic care therapeutic agent.

External ozone application to superficial tissues whose blood supply is reduced enhances tissue blood and oxygen perfusion.

There is evidence that ozone, via its oxidizing properties, inactivates bacterial toxins. Toxins, whose function is to destroy tissues, provide bacteria with colonizing advantage.

Ozone exerts its anti pan-pathogenic actions through entirely different mechanisms than conventional antibiotic agents. The latter must be constantly upgraded to surmount pathogen resistance and mutational change. Ozone, on the other hand, presents a direct and powerful oxidative challenge that any and all pathogens are incapable of circumventing.

Externally applied ozone/oxygen mixtures are entirely compatible with systemically administered antibiotics, as they are with debridement and other local wound care procedures.

Disadvantages of topical ozone therapy in diabetes

Ozone/oxygen mixtures are not transportable and need to be created at the site and time of administration.

Ozone/oxygen mixtures need to be administered serially in diabetic wounds. This may translate, in many circumstances, to daily applications until the lesion resolves.
Ozone/oxygen mixtures, applied externally, have limited penetrability. While they possess panpathogenic power on ulcer surfaces, their therapeutic action has limited range at greater depths of ulcer boundaries.

Conclusions

Topical ozone/oxygen therapy has shown effectiveness and safety in healing diabetic skin afflictions. In this article, the following are cited: Wounds with potential for infection, infected wounds, poorly healing wounds, diabetic leg ulcers, decubitus ulcers and gangrene.

Ozone possesses unique physico-chemical attributes enabling it to exert potent antipathogenic activity. Applied to the adjunctive treatment and management of diabetic leg lesions, ozone can tip the balance from chronic failure to resolution. There is one crucial element missing from contemporary therapeutic regimens for diabetic skin lesions: Ozone

Suggested Reading and References

Ackey D, Walton TE. Liquid-phase study of ozone inactivation of Venezuelan Equine Encephalomyelitis virus. Appl Environ Microbiol 1985; 50: 882-886
Albrant DH. Management of foot ulcers in patients with diabetes. J Am Pharm Assoc 2000; 40(4): 467-474
Anandi C, Alaguraja D, Natarajan V et al. Bacteriology of diabetic foot lesions. Indian J Med Microbiol 2004; 22: 175-178
Armstrong. Infectious Diseases, First Ed. Mosby, Philadelphia, 2000
Beckman JA, Creager MA, Libby P. Diabetes and Atherosclerosis. JAMA 2002 May 15; 287:2570-2581
Bensal V, Kalita J, Misra UK. Diabetic neuropathy. Postgraduate Medical J 2006; 82:95-100
Berger J, Blum D, Bourdette, DN, Corey-Bloom J. Adult Neurology. Blackwell Publishing, 2005
Bocci V. Oxygen-Ozone Therapy: A Critical Evaluation. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 2002
Bocci V. Biological and clinical effects of ozone. Br J Biomed Sci 1999 Jan; 56(4): 270-279
Bolton DC, Zee YC, Osebold JW. The biological effects of ozone on representative members of five groups of animal viruses. Environmental Research 1982; 27:476-48
Boulton AJ. The diabetic foot: a global view. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2000; 16 (suppl 1): 2-5
Boulton AJ, Malik RA, Arezzo JC et al. Diabetic somatic neuropathies. Diabetes Care 2004; 27:1458-1486
Broadwater WT, Hoehn RC, King PH. Sensitivity of three selected bacterial species to ozone. Applied microbiology 1973 Sept; 26(3): 391-393
Buckley RD, Hackney JD, Clarck K, Posin C. Ozone and human blood. Archives of Environmental Health 1975; 30:40-43
Caballero E, Frykberg RG. Diabetic foot infections. J Foot Ankle Surg 1998; 37:248-255
Cann A J. Principles of Molecular Virology. Academic Press, San Diego, 1997
Cardile V, et al. Effects of ozone on some biological activities of cells in vitro. Cell Biology and Toxicology 1995 Feb; 11(1): 11-21
Carpendale MT, Freeberg JK. Ozone inactivates HIV at noncytotoxic concentrations. Antiviral Research 1991; 16:281-292
Cavanagh PR, Lipsky BA, Bradbury AW et al., Treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. The Lancet 2005 Nov 12; 366(9498): 1725-1735
Champion RH, Burton JL, Ebling FJ. Textbook of Dermatology. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, 1992
Chapnick EK, Abter E. Necrotizing soft-tissue infections. Infectious Disease Clinics of North America 1996; 10(4): 835-843
Clark M, Price PE. Is wound healing a true science or a clinical art? The Lancet 2004 Oct 16; 364 (9443): 1388-1389
Dailey JF. Blood. Medical Consulting Group, Arlington MA, 1998
De Groot AC, Weyland WJ, Nater JP. Unwanted Effects of Cosmetics and Drugs Used in Dermatology, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1994
Dyas A, Boughton B, Das B. Ozone killing action against bacterial and fungal species. Journal of Clinical Pathology 1983; 36(10): 1102-1104
Epstein E. Common Skin Disorders, Saunders, Philadelphia, 1994
Evans AS, Kaslow RA (Eds). Viral infections of humans: Epidemiology and control. Plenum, New York, 1997
Falanga V, Phillips TJ, Harding KG et al. Text Atlas of Wound Management. Taylor and Francis, 2002
Goldberg IJ. Why does diabetes increase atherosclerosis: I don’t know. J Clin Investigation 2004 Sept 1; 114(5): 613-615
Gunther-Schlegel H. General Microbiology. Cambridge University Press, 2003
Harakeh M, Butler MJ. Factors influencing the ozone inactivation of enteric viruses in effluent. Ozone: Science and Engineering 1985; 6:235-243
Hogg S. Essential Microbiology. Wiley, New York, 2005
Ishizaki K, Shinriki N, Matsuyama N. Inactivation of Bacillus spores by gaseous ozone. J Applied Bacteriology 1986; 60(1): 67-72
Ishizaki K, Sawadaishi D, Muira K, Shinriki N. Effect of ozone on plasmid DNA of Escherichia coli in situ. Water Research 1987; 21(7): 828-823
Ivanova O, Bogdanov M, Miura K, Shinriki N. Ozone inactivation of enteroviruses in sewage. Vopr Virusol 1983; 0(6): 693-698
Jeffcoate WJ, Harding KG. Diabetic foot ulcers. The Lancet 2003 May 03; 361 (9368): 1545-1551
Knipe DM, Howley PM. Fundamental Virology, Fourth Edition. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, New York, 2001
Komananapalli IR, Lau BH. Inactivation of bacteriophage lambda, Escherichia coli, and Candida albicans by ozone. Abst Gen Meet Am Soc Microbiol 1997 May; 97:457
Kruse I, Edelman S. Evaluation and treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. Clinical Diabetes 2006 Spring; 24(2): 91-93
LeRoith D, Olefsky JM, Taylor SI. Diabetes Mellitus: A Fundamental and Clinical Text. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins (3rd Ed), 2003
Lesher JL. An Atlas of Microbiology. Informa Healthcare, 2000
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, 2001
Langlais B, Perrine D. Action of ozone on trophozoites and free amoeba cysts, whether pathogenic or not. Ozone: Science and Engineering 1986; 8:187-198
Leland DS. Clinical Virology. Saunders, Philadelphia, 1996
Lesher JL. An Atlas of Microbiology of the Skin. Informa Health Care, 2000
London NJ, Donnely R. Ulcerated lower limb. BMJ 2000 June 10; 320 (7249): 1589-1591
Lorh A, Gratzek J. Bactericidal and paraciticidal effects of an activated air oxidant in a closed aquatic system. J Aquaric Aquat Sci. 1984; 4:1-8
McNair Scott DB, Lesher EC. Effect of ozone on survival and permeability of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriology 1963 Mar; 85(3): 567-576
Marhell EK, Voge M, John DT. Medical Parasitology. Saunders, Philadelphia, 1986
Max J. Antibodies kill by producing ozone. Science 2002 Nov 15; 298:1319
Menzel DB. Ozone: an overview of its toxicity in man and animals. J Toxicol Environ Health 1984; 13:183-204
Mousa HA. Fungal infection of burn wounds in patients with open and occlusive treatment methods. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal 1999; 5(2): 333-336
Mudd JB, Leavitt R, Ongun A, McManus T. Reaction of ozone with amino acids and proteins. Atmos Environ 1969; 3:669-682
Murray PR (Ed). Manual of Clinical Microbiology. ASM Press, Washington DC, 1995
Olinescu R, Smith TL. Free Radicals in Medicine. Nova Science Publishers, Inc. Huntington, New York, 2002
O’Meara SM, Cullum NA, Majid M, Sheldon TA. Systematic review of antimicrobial agents used for chronic wounds. Brit. J Surgery 2001 Jan; 88(1): 4-21
Parish T. Mycobacterium: Molecular Microbiology of the Skin. Taylor & Francis, 2005
Poretsky L (Ed) Principles of Diabetes Mellitus, Springer, 2002
Razumovskii SD, Zaikov GE. Ozone and its reactions with organic compounds. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1984
Renard CB, Kramer F, Johansson F et al. Diabetes and diabetes-associated lipid abnormalities have distinct effects on initiation and progression of atherosclerotic lesions. J Clin Investigations 2004; 114:659-668
Ropper AH, Brown RH. Adams and Victor’s Principles of Neurology (8th Edition). McGraw-Hill, New York, 2005
Roy D, Wong PK, Engelbrecht RS, Chian ES. Mechanisms of enteroviral inactivation by ozone. Applied Environmental Microbiology 1981; 41:728-723
Ryan KJ (Ed). Medical Microbiology. Appleton & Lange, Norwalk, Connecticut, 1994
Sobsey MD. Inactivation of health-related microorganisms in water by disinfection processes. Water Science Technology 1989; 21(3): 179-195
Sunnen G. Ozone in medicine: Overview and future directions. Journal of Advancement in Medicine 1988; 1(3): 159-174
Sunnen G. Possible mechanisms of viral inactivation by ozone. Townsend Letter for Doctors 1994 Ap: 336
Tesfaye S, Chaturvedi N, Eaton SE et al. Vascular risk factors and diabetic neuropathy. NEJM 2005 Jan 27; 352(4): 341-350
Thanomsub B. Effects of ozone treatment on cell growth and ultrastructural changes in bacteria. J Gen Appl Microbiol 2002 Aug 01; 48(4): 193-199
Tomlinson D, Bradley R, Harris R, Jenner P. Neurobiology of Diabetic Neuropathy. Academic Press, 2002
Valentine GS, Foote CS, Greenberg A, Liebman JF (Eds). Active Oxygen in Biochemistry. Blackie Academic and Professional, London, 1995
Vaughn JM, Chen Y, Linburg K, Morales D. Inactivation of human and simian rotaviruses by ozone. Applied Environmental Microbiology 1987; 48:2218-2221
Vaughn JM, Chen YS, Novotny JF. Effects of ozone treatment on the infectivity of hepatitis A virus. Can J Microbiol 1990; 36: 557-560
Viebahn R. The Use of Ozone in Medicine. Odrei Publishers, Iffezheim, 1999
Wells KH, Latino J, Gavalchin J, Poiesz BJ. Inactivation of human immunodeficiency virus Type 1 by ozone in vitro. Blood 1991 Oct; 78(7): 1882-1890
Wentworth P, McDunn JE, Wentworth AD, et al., Evidence for antibody-catalysed ozone formation in bacterial killing and inflammation. Science 13 Dec 2002; 298:2195-2199
Werkmeister H. Subatmospheric 02/03 treatment of therapy-resistant wounds and ulcerations. OzoNachrichten 1985; 4:53-59
White DO, Fenner FJ. Medical Virology, Fourth edition. Academic Press, New York, 1994
Wichramanayake G, Rubin A, Sproul O. Inactivation of Giardia lamblia cysts with ozone. Applied and Environ Microbiology 1984; 84:671-672
Widmer G, Clancy T, Ward H et al. Structural and biochemical alterations in Giardia lamblia cysts exposed to ozone. J Parasitology 2002; 88(6): 1100-1106
Wunderlich RP, Peters EJ, Lavery LA. Systemic hyperbaric oxygen therapy: lower extremity wound healing and the diabetic foot. Diabetes Care 2000; 23:1551-1555
Young SB, Setlow P. Mechanisms of bacillus subtilis spore resistance to and killing by aqueous ozone. J Applied Microbiology 2004 May; 96(5): 1133-1142
Yu BP. Cellular defenses against damage from reactive oxygen species. Physiological Reviews 1994 Jan; 74(1): 139-162
BACK TO HOME

Gérard V. Sunnen M.D.
200 East 33rd St.
New York, NY 10016
212/679-0679 (voice)
212-679-8008 (fax)

Related Posts:

4 Responses to “Ozone in the Treatment of Diabetic Leg Ulcers – Article by Dr Sunnen”

  1. Maxim Vinokourov Says:

    Thanks a lot for this article. But especially for reading suggestions

  2. i.bengera Says:

    Is the application of ozone in lower-limb ujcers as described practiced anywhere? Where? THANK YOU.

  3. i.bengera Says:

    Is the application of ozone in treatment of lower-limb ulcers as described practiced abywhere? Where ? THANK YOU.

  4. Arrow Durfee Says:

    Yes, it is. On the home page for this blog in the right hand column you will find a list of links… one link is for ozone practitoners.

    Good luck